Talk:Jelsa/@comment-24820384-20150221214700/@comment-5952365-20150222225215

@Pitsla (You can just call me Ember, you don't have to put Fangirl111 aka Ember XD) I understand and I think it's very good and important that you want to protect the Wiki, but I don't think jumping to conclusions is wise or needed. I still don't see how BrutaLity was being mean, or inappropriate, especially considering the fact that only her and I were talking at first, and she wasn't even dissing this ship, we were talking about where specifically Jack landed on the ice and fell through, neither of us were insulting each other. I did not feel she was hateful to me, only giving her opinion, as did I. Why, by this logic, I too should have been labelled a "flamer" as well, since I was doing what she did (stating a different opinion).

@Wikia Contributor Yes, like I said on the BrutaLity's Wall, there is a fine line. But the fact is that your comment makes almost no to completely no sense -_- Were you there when this all happened? Do you know what we were talking about? Do you know what she said or how she acted? Do you know what I said or how I acted? Because it sure does not sound like it. Your example asks if she was insulting, which she was not. Now, I'm sorry if I sound mean, but if you don't know what happened, don't act like you do.

@BrutaLity I agree. I also agree with the statement about fun and enjoyment, I enjoyed talking to you because you brought up a good argument, and didn't immediately resort to insulting, so what the Wikia Contributor said, by default, is wrong. I also like pointing things out and analyzing them, like I noticed you seem to like doing with ships, and that's enjoyable for me as well, so again, what they said didn't make sense and is wrong.